I was a wonderful place, you could see the kind of things that turists appreciate but you could see also that it was that way not because it was deliberately cultivated to amuse foreign people, but because local culture is still alive. This is to say that I support cultural diversity as long as people is interested in conserving it without external pressures. I do not believe that the culture of a person must be determined by the place that person is born, or skin color, or that cultures are static sets of memes designed to be worshipped and not changed in the slightest way.
That was why I loved Otavalo. It is a wonderful blend of the old, the new and the foreign. It is a symbol of the Globalization I crave for, not getting McDonalds everywhere, but mixing things from different places to achieve a truly unique way of life. Diversify, not homogenize.
The unexpected comes here:
What is important here is not rantling about the loss of a "primitive" and beloved culture rather than exploring the possibilities of many different cultures sharing a common pool of values, artifacts and expressions, each one sampling them on its own way, even if it is with distinctive historical patterns, as is the case here. I am sure that there are many more examples in Otavalo of foreign stuff, but for me the "authenticity" of Otavalo is not an issue as long as they don't claim that musical instrument from the Pacific are autoctonous. For me, finding non-autoctonous things out of the mainstream in Otavalo did not meant Otavalo is less authentic. It means otavalo is more exciting and heartening about the possibilities of creating new cultures different form the old ones and different from the new homogenizing trends.
I do remember when you told me about those strange musical instruments in Quito, sounded weird to me! But in fact globalization has its points..as far as we're not talking about free markets and multinationals:)
ReplyDeleteIt's been a long time since the last time I wrote in english. I´ll try to do it more often, your blog will be a nice place for it:)
It's very pleasant to have you back on line, and to read you once more Guido.
ReplyDeleteNice that you had chosen english as the main language for this, surely it will a good practice forum for all of us.
As usual your writing it's very interesting, and I agree, globalization is a reality, but not one that involves an homogeneous point of view; the mixing of cultures, races, and people in general is always for good.
At some time we speak of this question. I have liked the sentence: "Diversify, not homogenize."
ReplyDeleteI congratulate for your blog; it will also be a pretty space to write in english for me.